e-book Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition) book. Happy reading Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Le conservatisme américain: Un mouvement qui a transformé les États-Unis (French Edition) Pocket Guide.
Nouvelles d’Orient
Contents:
  1. TRANSLATION VIOLENCE
  2. Articles connexes :
  3. Ce que sont pour moi Lyndon H. et Helga Zepp-LaRouche - Jacques Cheminade - Site officiel

Furthermore, in a context of sluggish growth, of near-zero interest rates and non-existent inflation, it is legitimate for the public authorities to take on more debt to invest in the climate and in training, with the support of central banks.

In the European context this will however demand an in-depth intellectual and political reform. The questions of investment, debt and of money must be discussed openly in the context of a parliamentary body in place of the automatic budgetary rules constantly circumvented and the usual closed doors. These discussions involve the whole of society and cannot be left to councils of ministers of finance or governors of central banks. Finally, and above all, the monetary expansion which took place in the period must not lead to a new form of monetarist illusion.

The considerable challenges which are ours global warming, the rise of inequalities do not simply demand that we mobilise adequate resources. They also demand that we build new norms of justice in the distribution of effort, which involves the adoption by elected assemblies of progressive taxes on income, financial assets and carbon emissions and by the implementation of a new system of financial transparency.

The creation of money can help, provided that it is not a fetish and remains in its proper place: namely a tool within a collective system in which taxes and parliaments must retain the main role. Good news: given the results of the European elections it would seem that French and European citizens are becoming more concerned about global warming.


  • #0184 ROSEBUD VINTAGE KNITTING PATTERN (Single Patterns)!
  • Vérités et contre-vérités sur l’Ukraine – Le front de l’information et de la désinformation.
  • Tug of War: Choosing Between Zion and Babylon;
  • Im Not Dead, Am I?: A Paranormal Family Living in Rural New York..

The problem is that the election which has just taken place did little to further the basic issue. In real terms, which political forces do the ecologists intend to govern with and what is their programme for action? Now the decision-makers in the Greens, intoxicated by their success, particularly in France, refuse to say whether they would like to govern with the left or with the right.

However, it is increasingly clear that the resolution of the climate challenge will not be possible without a strong movement in the direction of the compression of social inequalities at all levels. With the present magnitude of inequality, the advance towards austerity of energy will be wishful thinking. In the first instance because carbon emissions are strongly concentrated amongst the rich. A drastic reduction in purchasing power of the richest would therefore in itself have a substantial impact on the reduction of emissions at global level.


  • Peter Pecker?
  • Table of Contents;
  • Les Etats-Unis et la guerre contre le terrorisme - Irénées!
  • Numéros en texte intégral.
  • Your U.S. Citizenship Guide: What You Need to Know to Pass Your U.S. Citizenship Test With Companion CD-ROM.
  • Navigation.
  • La Henry Jackson Society, l’astre noir de l’univers très britannique des néo-cons.

Furthermore, it is difficult to see how the middle and working classes in the rich countries as in the emerging economies would accept to change their lifestyle which is nevertheless essential if they do not have the proof that the richest are also involved. The chain of political events observed in France in , which was strangely absent from the campaign, provides a dramatic and symbolical illustration of this need fot justice. The principal of the carbon tax was relatively well accepted in France in and it was intended to increase it regularly until to enable the country to reduce its emissions in keeping with pledges made under the Paris Accords.

But if a progression of this sort is to be acceptable, it is essential that it affect the biggest polluters at least as much as those with more modest incomes and that the totality of the product of the tax be allocated to the energy transition and used to assist the households most affected. The Macron government has done just the opposite. The taxes on fuels paid by the lowest incomes have been used to finance other priorities, beginning with the abolition of the wealth tax ISF and the progressive tax on incomes from capital.

Given the social unrest, the government could have decided to cancel its gifts to the richest and to devote the money at long last to the climate and to compensating the poorest. On the contrary: as stubborn as Sarkozy between and , with his pro-rich tax shield, Macron has decided to stick with his gifts to the rich and to cancel the increases in the carbon tax in complete disregard for the Paris Accords — today nobody knows when the carbon tax will be reinstated.

By choosing to make the abolition of the wealth tax ISF the symbol of his policy, the party of the President has confirmed that he is indeed the heir to the liberal and pro-business right wing. The sociological structure of his electorate, focused on top incomes and wealth, in and even more so in , means there can be no doubt about this. In these conditions, one might wonder why the French or German Greens envisage governing with the liberals and the conservatives.

The desire to access responsibilities is only human. But can we be sure that this is really in the interest of the planet?

TRANSLATION VIOLENCE

If the left-wing and the ecologists were to have allied in France, they would have overtaken the liberals and the nationalists. If they were to unite in the European Parliament they would form by far the biggest group and could have more influence. If a social-federal and ecological alliance of this sort were to come into existence, the various left-wing would also have to go some of the way.

Les Insoumis in France and Die Linke in Germany cannot just say that they want to change the present version of Europe or to get out of the treaties. They have to explain which new treaties they would like to sign. As far as the socialists and social-democrats are concerned, their practice of power does mean that they bear considerable responsibility for the breakdown of the political system and they have a central role to play to enable its reconstruction.

They will have to recognise past errors: they are largely responsible for forging the present European framework, in particular by organising the free circulation of capital without taxation, or by leading us to believe that they were going to renegotiate the treaties whereas, in reality, they have no precise plan. It is possible to build a model for equitable and sustainable development in Europe, but this demands discussion and difficult choices: all the more reason to get down to work with no more ado.

Articles connexes :

Le mal est profond et ancien. En , de jeunes militants lancent le mouvement Federal Union au Royaume-Uni. Three years after the referendum on Brexit and on the eve of the new European elections, the scepticism about Europe is still as strong, particularly amongst the most disadvantaged sections of society. The problem is deep and long-standing. In all the referendums for the last 25 years the working classes have systematically expressed their disagreement with the Europe presented to them, whereas the richest and the most privileged classes supported it.

Does not socialism flow from your own doctrines? What can we do about it? We are well aware, please believe me, of the chink in our armor. Therefore we have never denied socialism absolutely.

Ce que sont pour moi Lyndon H. et Helga Zepp-LaRouche - Jacques Cheminade - Site officiel

What words do we use, for the most part, for socialists? We tell them: between you and us the difference is only a matter of time. You are wrong today, but perhaps in three hundred years, you will be right. Just wait! In that case, so much the worse for you! Since without prejudice to the future of your theories, we regard them as immoral and subversive for the present, we will hound them to our utmost ability.

We will cut them down as the scythe cuts down tares 46 …We will dispatch you to our prisons and to penal servitude, there to attack the present institutions of religion, family and property. So much the better. We rely on persecution to advance our doctrines. The finest platform one can give to an idea is the scaffold or the stake. Fine us, imprison us, deport us… we ask nothing better. If you could reestablish the Inquisition against socialists we would be assured of the triumph of our cause.

FASCISM INC MULTILINGUAL (long version)

We are still in a position not to need this extreme remedy. The Majority and Power are on our side. We will see if it is well-founded or not. If you do not believe in absolute principles, you must — is it not the case? These aggregations may have similar principles and interests, but they can also have opposing principles and interests. That which is just for one, may not be just for the other. What is useful for this one, may be harmful to that one. What is the necessary result, however, of this antagonism in principles and interests? If it be true that the world is not governed by universal and permanent laws, if it is true that each nation has principles and interests which are special to it, interests and principles essentially variable according to circumstances and the [p.

Joseph de Maistre has anyway shown beyond doubt that war is inevitable and necessary. You admit then, and in effect you cannot not admit, that the world is eternally condemned to war?

La Pratique de la Justice Spatiale en Crise

Yes, but in the past in all societies the vast majority of the population were slaves or serfs. Take the serfs of Russia! Are they not such stuff as despotism can mould at will? Does it not make of them, just as it pleases, mere drudges or cannon-fodder? Unfortunately, there is no longer any way of reestablishing it among us. There are no longer slaves nor serfs.